Using the ENPC and the ESPC as a Parallel Translation Corpus : Adverbs of Frequency and Usuality

The topic for the present study is intended to represent a common denominator between my own research and Karin Aijmer’s. The EnglishNorwegian Parallel Corpus (ENPC) and the English-Swedish Parallel Corpus (ESPC) are sister corpora with common objectives, design criteria, and structures; cf. Aijmer et al (1996:79 f). Especially their fiction parts also share a good number of texts. One advantage of this is that it is possible not only to compare English to Norwegian and Swedish respectively, but also to compare different translations of the English originals with each other. Adverbs of frequency and usuality were chosen as a test case for the feasibility of using the ENPC and the ESPC as a parallel translation corpus, i.e. one which contains alternative translations of the same text. This was partly because I have worked with time adverbials previously (e.g. Hasselgård 1996) and partly because usuality can be viewed as a category of modality (Halliday & Matthiessen 2004:147), a topic closely associated with the research of Karin Aijmer. The questions discussed in the present paper are the following: how are adverbs of frequency and usuality translated into Norwegian and Swedish? To what extent can the translations from English in the ENPC and the ESPC be seen as parallel/alternative translations? Are Norwegian and Swedish similar enough to be regarded as alternative translations? In other words: to what extent are the same options available in both languages? And finally, assuming that usuality is a modal category – how


Introduction
The topic for the present study is intended to represent a common denominator between my own research and Karin Aijmer's.The English-Norwegian Parallel Corpus (ENPC) and the English-Swedish Parallel Corpus (ESPC) are sister corpora with common objectives, design criteria, and structures; cf.Aijmer et al (1996:79 f).Especially their fiction parts also share a good number of texts.One advantage of this is that it is possible not only to compare English to Norwegian and Swedish respectively, but also to compare different translations of the English originals with each other.Adverbs of frequency and usuality were chosen as a test case for the feasibility of using the ENPC and the ESPC as a parallel translation corpus, i.e. one which contains alternative translations of the same text.This was partly because I have worked with time adverbials previously (e.g.Hasselgård 1996) and partly because usuality can be viewed as a category of modality (Halliday & Matthiessen 2004:147), a topic closely associated with the research of Karin Aijmer.
The questions discussed in the present paper are the following: how are adverbs of frequency and usuality translated into Norwegian and Swedish?To what extent can the translations from English in the ENPC and the ESPC be seen as parallel/alternative translations?Are Norwegian and Swedish similar enough to be regarded as alternative translations?In other words: to what extent are the same options available in both languages?And finally, assuming that usuality is a modal category -how do adverbs of frequency and usuality interact with other expressions of modality?

Material
The material for this study consists of the fiction texts that are common to the ENPC and the ESPC: 24 texts in all, i.e. approximately 300,000 words of original English text and their translations into Norwegian and Swedish.2With the tools available, there is no way of searching both corpora at the same time.Some manual work was thus required in order to sift out examples from texts that do not occur in both corpora and to combine the two translations.

Adverbs of frequency and usuality
The following adverbs have been investigated: sometimes, occasionally, frequently, often, usually, normally, rarely, seldom, and hardly ever.They typically function as adverbials, of a type that can be classified in different ways.Traditionally they are viewed as frequency adjuncts and a subcategory of time adjuncts, as in Quirk et al (1985:541) or Hasselgård (1996).In Huddleston and Pullum (2002:713) frequency is a separate category of adjuncts expressing "quantification in the clause".It is argued that frequency is "conceptually different from time" in that "frequency adjuncts quantify (sub)situations, and that is not the same as quantifying times " (2002:716).Halliday and Matthiessen distinguish between frequency and usuality, the former being a type of circumstantial adjunct (extent in time), and the latter belonging to the field of modality: "[frequency] is related to the interpersonal category of usuality […] but it is not identical to it; usuality is a modal assessment referring to position on a scale between positive and negative (always/never), whereas frequency is the extent of repetition of the occurrence of the process." (2004: 264).Clearly, the concept of modal usuality is related to Huddleston and Pullum's idea of frequency adjuncts quantifying a situation.3But rather than establishing two separate categories, Huddleston and Pullum distinguish between bounding and non-bounding frequency (2002:714), roughly corresponding to definite and indefinite frequency in Quirk et al (1985:542).
In the present, exploratory study, the distinction between usuality and frequency has not been maintained, chiefly because it seems to me less than clear-cut in many cases; for instance many of the same lexical items are used to express both meanings.Furthermore, as pointed out by Huddleston and Pullum, it is sometimes the semantics of the verb rather than the adverb itself that differentiates bounding and non-bounding frequency (2002:714).The adverbs studied here are most apt to express usuality or non-bounding frequency; i.e. they do not normally indicate the number of times an event is repeated.But sometimes the context can indicate a bounding frequency reading, perhaps particularly of occasionally and frequently.
The adverbs always and never were not studied, partly because their frequency in the corpora would greatly expand the scope of this paper, and partly because I considered them close enough to yes and no to be peripheral to modal meaning.However, Halliday and Matthiessen regard always as a 'high value usuality' marker, and observe that "even a high value modal ('certainly', 'always') is less determinate than a polar form: […] it always rains in summer is less invariable than it rains in summer." 3 Huddleston and Pullum too note a similarity between frequency and modality: "Sometimes can also convey much the same meaning as modal may […]" (2002: 713, fn.).(2004: 147).4Other potential candidates for the study, such as infrequently or regularly, simply did not occur often enough in the corpus to be included.With regard to modal usuality and degrees of oftenness, rarely, seldom, and hardly ever mark a low degree; sometimes and occasionally a low/median degree, and usually, normally, frequently and often a (relatively) high degree (cf.Halliday & Matthiessen 2004: 620).Table 1 shows the occurrence of the selected adverbs of frequency and usuality in the fiction texts that are common to ENPC and ESPC.

Dictionary data vs. corpus data on adverbs of frequency and usuality
To answer the question whether Swedish and Norwegian are similar enough to view translations into these languages as 'multiple translations' it is important to establish the extent to which the same options are available in both languages.Table 2 shows the entries for the adverbs studied in two comprehensive bilingual dictionaries.The entries that are common to Norwegian and Swedish have been underlined.The most frequent correspondences of occasionally (av og til, ibland) are not given in the two dictionaries quoted.On the other hand, both av og til and ibland occur among the alternatives given for sometimes.The dictionaries thus seem to treat sometimes and occasionally as more different than the translators do.It may also be noted that the Swedish translation in (5) has bruka in addition to the frequency adverb.In fact, a paraphrase with bruka is the second most frequent correspondence of usually in Swedish, and this is the only case of a paraphrase being among the most frequent translations of a usuality/frequency adverb.Such paraphrases are absent from the dictionary translations.
Examples ( 1)-( 8) can be deceptive in depicting the Norwegian and Swedish translations as too similar.In fact, the translations differ from each other in most cases, cf.Table 3.However, the fact that the Norwegian and Swedish translators make different lexicogrammatical choices does not in itself mean that the languages are different.The multiple translation corpus of the OMC (consisting of a scientific article and short story with ten different Norwegian translations of each)5 shows clearly that translators choose differently even in such a seemingly simple area as single words which all have perfectly straightforward equivalents in the target language.Table 4 shows a broader picture of the translation correspondences in the ENPC/ESPC material.Adverbs that are relatively synonymous-as is also indicated by their translations into both Norwegian and Swedish-have been grouped together.The translations that occur in only one of the languages have been placed in the columns for Norwegian and Swedish, respectively, while those that occur in both languages appear in the middle column.As can be seen from Table 4, "common", rather than signifying full identity between the Norwegian and the Swedish expression, often means 'cognate' or 'equivalent construction'.

Grammatical categories used in the translation of frequency/usuality adverbs
If we widen the perspective beyond purely lexical correspondences, we can survey the paradigm of expressions used to convey meanings of frequency and usuality.As expected, adverbs, adverb phrases and other realizations of adverbials (particularly prepositional phrases and noun phrases) are the most common type of translation equivalent used in both Swedish and Norwegian, as shown in Figure 1.Adverbs and adverb phrases (given together under 'adverb' in Figure 1) are used more in Swedish than in Norwegian to translate the English adverbs of frequency and usuality.Norwegian has a higher proportion of other realizations of adverbials and also a slightly more frequent use of other solutions, including zero correspondences.6The following sections will take a closer look at the 'other solutions', which *comprise* the following categories: matrix clause (cf.Johansson 2005), modal auxiliary, modal catenative, and integration of the frequency/usuality meaning in a noun phrase.It is no coincidence that more examples are given here of the Norwegian det hender than of its Swedish cognate, as the construction is more common in Norwegian (13 vs. 3 instances).Furthermore, as illustrated by ( 11), the Swedish construction occurs with a supporting frequency adverbial in two out of the three cases, while the Norwegian det hender construction has a supporting adverbial in only two out of 13 cases.The combination of det hender/händer and a supporting adverbial is shown in (12), which is the only example where both Norwegian and Swedish have chosen a matrix clause.Note however that hendte det/hände det probably corresponds to would in the original.
(12) Sometimes a woman would ask my father to "speak to" her husband.(NG1) Ofte hendte det at en kvinne ba min far "snakke med" hennes mann.
The frequency difference between the Norwegian and Swedish det hender/händer construction may be caused by the apparent tendency of Swedish translators to stay closer to the wording of the original; original Swedish and Norwegian, checked in Språkbanken and the Oslo Corpus respectively, show similar frequencies of the construction.

Modal auxiliary 'kunne'/'kunde')
Usuality being a category of modality, it was expected that modal auxiliaries would show up as translations of usuality adverbs.The modal auxiliaries found in the translations are kan and kunne/kunde occurring as translations of sometimes and occasionally.Examples ( 13) and ( 14) show kan and kunne in the Norwegian translation, while (15) shows kan in Swedish.
(13) If she's busy in another room he's sometimes home for half an hour or so before she knows he's there.(NG1) Hvis hun er opptatt et annet sted i huset kan det ta en halvtime før hun er klar over at han er kommet.Om hon sysslar med något i ett annat rum händer det att han är hemma en halvtimme eller så innan hon vet att han har kommit.
(14) Your obituary of my friend Francis Cornish (Sept.13) is correct in all its facts, but gives a dour impression of a man who was sometimes crusty and difficult, but also generous and kind in countless personal relationships.(RDA1) Professor, pastor Simon Darcourt skriver: Deres nekrolog over min venn Francis Cornish (13.sept.)er korrekt i alle faktiske detaljer, men gir et litt forbeholdent inntrykk av en mann som riktignok kunne vaere grinete og vanskelig, men også generøs og vennlig i utallige personlige forhold.
(15) His mommy explained how shadows could sometimes look like the bad things they sometimes showed on TV or in the comic books, … (SK1) Hans mor forklarte hvordan skygger noen ganger kunne se ut som de faele tingene han og til så på TV, eller i tegneseriebladene.… Hans mamma förklarade hur skuggorna ibland liknar de hemska saker som man kan se på TV och i serietidningar ...
It is interesting to note that both the Norwegian and the Swedish translators of ( 15) have given two different translations of the word sometimes, which is used twice in the same sentence by the original author (Stephen King).Possibly, this is an effect of translators being more cautious about breaking the rules for good writing than authors are, and thus avoiding the repetition of the same word within a sentence.7 The use of modal auxiliaries as a correspondence of frequency /usuality adverbs highlights the function of both these types of expressions of placing a proposition on the "region of uncertainty that lies between yes and no" (Halliday & Matthiessen 2004: 147), i.e. "sometimes yes, sometimes no, with different degrees of oftenness attached" (ibid.).It seems that kan and kunne/kunde generally express a median degree of oftenness; they are found exclusively as translations of sometimes and occasionally.It may be noted that kan/kunne are also the only Norwegian modal auxiliaries found to express usuality in Løken (forthcoming).
Like matrix clause correspondences, modal auxiliary translations may occur with a supporting adverbial, as shown in ( 16).Again, supporting adverbials seem to be more frequent in Swedish than in Norwegian; two out of three instances vs. one out of five.

Modal catenative: 'pleie'/'bruka'
Some lexical verbs convey modal meaning.English has the expression used to which is often listed in grammars as a marginal modal auxiliary (e.g.Quirk et al 1985: 138).The corresponding Norwegian and Swedish expressions (pleie/bruka) do not seem to have been grammaticalized to the same extent to approach auxiliary status.On the other hand, they are more flexible than used to in that they can be used in all tenses.Swedish bruka seems closer to auxiliary status than pleie in that it is followed by a bare infinitive, while pleie is followed by the infinitive marker å.Examples of pleie and bruka are shown in ( 17) and ( 18). ( 17) "And see," Macon said, "there's this place I usually board him but they suddenly claim he bites.(AT1) "Du skjønner," sa Macon, "det stedet han pleier å vaere sier plutselig at han biter."Jag brukar faktiskt inackordera honom på ett annat ställe", sade Macon, "men där påstår dom plötsligt att han bits. (18) In the ease of the family presence we often didn't actually greet each other at meals; it would have been like talking to oneself.(NG1) Innen familien pleide vi ikke å hilse på hverandre før måltidene, det ville ha vaert som å snakke med seg selv.När vi bara var familjen brukade vi ofta inte säga någon hälsning när vi satte oss till bords; det skulle ha varit som att tala med sig själv.
In Swedish, bruka is the second most common correspondence of usually.It also occurs as a correspondence of normally, often and sometimes.
The Norwegian pleie occurs as a translation of the same words.However, pleie is less frequent; while bruka occurs 15 times, pleie occurs only five times.Of the 15 Swedish examples with bruka, six occur with a supporting adverbial, but none of the Norwegian pleie-examples do.
Thus we recognize the pattern found for both matrix clauses and modal auxiliaries; supporting adverbials are used more often in Swedish.
As mentioned above, the verb bruke can be used in this construction in Norwegian too, but it does not occur in the present material.However, ENPC non-fiction gave one example in the original Norwegian texts, cf. ( 19).Here the degree of oftenness has been increased to always in the translation, probably with minimal consequences for the overall meaning since the predicate conveys a punctual event. (19) Det var der Lauritz brukte å hente ny forsyning.(PEJ1) It was there that Lauritz always got a new supply.

Adverbial  part of NP
In a few examples, the usuality meaning of an English adverb has been incorporated in a noun phrase in the translation.Examples are given in ( 20) and ( 21).In all these cases it is the adverb occasionally that has been rendered by en og annen and the like.It is perhaps doubtful whether en eller annan in ( 21) conveys usuality meaning, but en og annen in (20) seems to convey the same meaning as occasionally, which in this case is close to non-bounding frequency, although the extent of repetition is left unspecified.
(20) Ted fierce and expository, Kate pink and excited, the Swede occasionally offering corrections, Hugo contributing a description of cholera in the Congo (which both Ted and the Swede disputed, though they hadn't been there and Hugo had), they continued cheerfully until the cheese.(MD1) De fortsatte muntert helt til osten, Ted voldsom og forklarende, Kate lyserød og opphisset, svensken med en og annen beriktigelse, Hugo bidro med en beskrivelse av kolera i Kongo (som både Ted og svensken trakk i tvil, skjønt Hugo hadde vaert der og de ikke).

Zero correspondence
In some cases, the frequency adverb has left no trace of its meaning in the translation or in the surrounding sentences.The Swedish rendering of ( 22) is an example of this.As a result of the zero translation, the proposition is no longer situated in the 'region of uncertainty between yes and no', but has positive polarity; i.e. panic seems invariably to be imminent.Interestingly, the Norwegian translation ofte also represents an increase in the degree of oftenness from the original sometimes.A similar increase in of oftenness is found in the Norwegian rendering of ( 23), which is another example of zero correspondence.There may, however, be a trace of usuality in the main verb foretrakk ('preferred'), which may imply that 'he' sometimes wore ties of dispreferred colours. ( The trouble was that they felt so powerfully it utterly overset them and brought them sometimes near to panic.(RDA1) Vanskeligheten var at de hadde så sterke følelser at de ble fullstendig overmannet, noe som ofte brakte dem nesten til panikkens rand.Problemet var att känslorna var så kraftiga att de blev dem övermäktiga och att paniken [Ø] låg på lur.
Like most of the other 'non-adverbial' correspondences of English frequency/usuality adverbs, zero correspondence is also more frequent in Norwegian than in Swedish (cf. Figure 1).This may suggest that translators in the two countries have different ideas about good translation practice; it seems that Swedish translators stay more closely to the wording of the original text while Norwegian translators choose a wider variety of solutions-often for no apparent reason.An investigation of translation ideologies in Norway and Sweden would be very interesting, but must remain outside the scope of the present study.

Differences between corpus and dictionary data
The comparison of the dictionary data and the range of translations found in the ENPC and the ESPC shows that dictionaries only give lexical, congruent translations, the corpora offer various paraphrases, e.g. in terms of matrix clause (det hender, det händer) and modal expressions (pleie, bruka).These may be given in examples in the dictionaries, but are not really suggested as translation equivalents.In other words, the dictionaries show only the lexical part of the lexicogrammatical paradigm for expressing usuality and frequency.Moreover, there seems to be a greater degree of overlapping translations across the frequency adverbs in corpus data than in dictionaries.A case in point is sometimes and occasionally, which share few of the dictionary alternatives, but overlap to a relatively great extent in the ways they are translated in the corpus.The translations thus show 'degrees of oftenness' as a continuum.It is probably important that translations can rely on context for the correct interpretation, while dictionaries must attempt to distinguish the different degrees of oftenness conveyed by the adverbs more or less out of context.

How do usuality adverbs correspond with other expressions of modality?
According to Halliday and Matthiessen (2004:147) usuality, like other types of modality, can be expressed (in English) in three different ways: by a finite modal auxiliary, by an adjunct of usuality, or by both together.As the present study takes usuality adjuncts as its starting point, it is not surprising that the most frequent correspondence type in the translations is usuality adjuncts.However, as the present material shows, there is some correspondence with modal auxiliaries (kan/kunne), as well as with modal catenatives (pleie/bruka).In addition, the expression det hender / det händer may be seen as a grammatical metaphor for thematizing modal usuality (Johansson 2005:84).As we have seen there are also combinations of adverbs and other modal expressions.As reported in section 5, combinations of modal adverbs and other expressions of modality seems to be more frequent in Swedish than in Norwegian.
However, the present study cannot purport to give a fair picture of modal usuality in English, Norwegian and Swedish.First, only a limited set of frequency/usuality adverbs have been studied.More expressions of usuality (e.g.used to, would and may) and their correspondences need to be included to explore the whole paradigm.It would also be interesting to study the outer-value modality markers always and never and their correspondences.Furthermore, all the Norwegian and Swedish expressions of usuality discussed in this study occur in translations from English.Clearly a study of usuality expressions in original Norwegian and Swedish is needed to check the validity of the findings presented here.Finally, a future cross-linguistic study of expressions of usuality in English, Norwegian and Swedish should also include English translations of Norwegian and Swedish expressions.Only in this way is it possible to shed more light on the interaction of adverbials and other expressions of usuality in all three languages.

How similar are Norwegian and Swedish?
The question whether the ENPC and the ESPC can be seen as a parallel translation corpus cannot be addressed without saying something about the extent of similarity between Norwegian and Swedish.Torp (1982:155 and1998:106) estimates that between 85% and 90% of the 1000 most frequent words in Swedish and Norwegian are shared between the languages, allowing for certain differences in orthography and morphology.Although the frequency adverbs may not all be among the 1000 most frequent words, Torp's estimate gives an indication that much of the same vocabulary is available to translators into both Swedish and Norwegian.However, as was shown in Table 3 above, translators make the same lexicogrammatical choice in only 36% of the cases.
In order to find out to what extent the translations could have been more similar in the remaining 64% of the sentences I conducted the following, admittedly rather doubtful, experiment: I went through all the cases where the Swedish and the Norwegian translations differed and tried to decide if the Swedish solution would have been possible in Nor-wegian too.In 74% of the cases it probably was, and in only 15% it clearly was not.8Although Tables 2 and 4 above show that some lexical items occur only in one of the languages, these are mainly infrequent options in the material.Thus one may claim that Norwegian and Swedish are to a great extent equivalent when it comes to the translation of frequency and usuality adverbs.But there are some provisos, such as the following: • Swedish ibland is vastly more frequent than Norwegian iblant (120 vs. 22 occurrences).Thus a frequency of iblant in the Norwegian translations corresponding to that of ibland in the Swedish translations would seem odd, even if iblant can be used in many of the same sentences in isolation.It also seems that Norwegian iblant cannot be focused (*bare iblant), as illustrated by (24) below.Furthermore, ibland, but not iblant, is used in front of another adverb that restricts its scope (Sw.ibland på nätterna, No. *iblant om natten).It is possible that iblant cannot be used about a restricted number of occurences, as in (25).• Swedish bruka occurs more frequently than the Norwegian pleie, and often in combination with a frequency adverb.It seems that pleie cannot be used felicitously in all the same contexts where bruka occurs (e.g. in example 10 above).• Swedish då och då is more frequent than Norwegian nå og da (8 vs. 2 occurrences).This tendency is even stronger in the data from Språkbanken and the Oslo Corpus; 30 vs. 2.3 times per million words, respectively.• No. av og til is frequent (e.g.example 2), while av och till does not occur in material and is also infrequent in original Swedish.Clearly, the differences in frequency between members such pairs as iblant/ibland, av og til/av och till and nå og da/då och då have implications for translation choices.While ibland is totally unmarked in Swedish, and may be said to be the translation alternative for both sometimes and occasionally, the cognate iblant has a much more restricted distribution and use.Similarly I expect that frequent use of av och till would seem odd to a Swedish reader, while it is frequent and unmarked in Norwegian as a translation of sometimes/occasionally.

Concluding remarks
One of the questions asked at the outset of this paper was whether the translations in the ENPC and the ESPC can be seen as parallel/alternative translations so that the two corpora can be used as a multiple translation corpus.The answer, it seems, lies truly within the realm of modality: possibly yes, possibly no.
The answer is 'no' if we are mainly looking for lexical alternatives, expecting the translations used in the ENPC to be automatically usable in Swedish or those in the ESPC to work in Norwegian.Clearly, the inventory of translations found in Norwegian cannot be used as a thesaurus for a Swedish translator, and vice versa.Or rather, the answer may be almost no, since many of the lexical alternatives are shared between Norwegian and Swedish, and many of the shared alternatives are common in both languages.However, as pointed out above there are important differences in the frequency and distribution of some lexical items.In addition, there are of course some alternatives that are unique to one of the languages, although most of these are relatively infrequent.We should also keep in mind that Norwegian and Swedish -despite the great similarity between the two languages -also differ in their 'preferred ways of putting things'.
To end on a more positive note, the answer is 'yes' if we generalize the lexicogrammar and look for equivalent constructions as categories of translations.While the constructions may have different realizations in the two languages (e.g.pleie vs. bruka), the patterns and constructions available in the two languages are to a very great extent the same.The main difference is that Swedish seems to have a greater preference for adverbs to translate the frequency and usuality adverbs studied in this paper, while Norwegian employs a range of other adverbial realizations, such as prepositional phrases and noun phrases.
It is very clear-and nowhere in the region of uncertainty that lies between yes and no-that the present study could not have been carried out without the co-operation that has existed between the universities of Oslo, Lund and Göteborg for many years.If the ENPC and the ESPC can be used as a parallel translation corpus it is due not only to the similarity between our languages, but to the common research interests and the good working relations across the border that resulted in the parallel preparation of our parallel corpora.

Table 1 .
The occurrence of some adverbs of frequency and usuality

Table 2 .
Dictionary data on adverbs of frequency and usuality

Table 3 :
Similarity of translation choices inNorwegian and Swedish.

Table 4 :
Commonality of correspondences in Norwegian and Swedish translations from English.Many of the correspondences listed under Norwegian or Swedish in Table 4 could easily have been used in the other language, but they do not occur in the present material.One example is the Norwegian av og til, which has the Swedish cognate av och till, attested in Språkbanken.However, in contrast to av og til, av och till is not very frequent (only 2.8 occurrences per million words as against 41.9 in the Oslo Corpus), and does not occur as a translation of either sometimes or occasionally.Con- versely, Norwegian bruke can be used just like Swedish bruka to indicate usuality, but it does not occur in the present material (but cf.example 19).Furthermore, the expression for det meste / för det mesta, occurs only in Swedish as a translation of frequently/often, but has been used in Norwegian as a translation of usually.Yet other translations may occur in only one of the languages because they are not very accurate, such as aldrig (Sw.) for seldom or ofte (No.) for sometimes.
' means that the whole clause/sentence where the frequency adverb occurs is left out in the translated text.clause.English does not have a construction equivalent to det hender /händer; it happens having a different meaning (2005:78 ff).According to Johansson, adverbials are frequent correspondences of det hender, but modal auxiliaries alsooccur (2005:70).Examples of sometimes being translated by the Norwegian det hender are given in (9) and (10) while the Swedish det händer is used in (10).At school I sometimes used to get better marks than him, but that was when he chose not to exert himself.(JB1) Det hendte jeg fikk bedre karakterer enn ham, men det var når han ikke anstrengte seg.I skolan brukade jag ibland få bättre betyg än han, men det var bara när han lät bli att lägga manken till.

•
Swedish i vanliga/normala fall occurs as a correspondence of normally and usually, but does not have an equivalent Norwegian expression that can be used in the same way.Noen ganger stiger visse ting til overflaten, noen ganger andre, noen ganger ingenting.Ibland är det ett som kommer upp till ytan, ibland något annat, ibland ingenting.