Roy Eriksen’s essay asks the question whether the notoriously unattributed The Taming of a Shrew might not in fact bear the trace of Marlowe’s hand. Recognising the tendency of critics to dismiss the play as a mere “bad quarto” of a lost play that Shakespeare drew on, Eriksen suggests that A Shrew may be Marlowe’s original work—a claim which the long-recognised presence of Marlovian allusions and Marlowe’s own propensity for self-quotation do not reject.
How to Cite:
Eriksen, R., 2005. The Taming of a Shrew: Composition as Induction to Authorship. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 4(2), pp.41–63. DOI: http://doi.org/10.35360/njes.36
Eriksen, R., 2005. The Taming of a Shrew: Composition as Induction to Authorship. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 4(2), pp.41–63. DOI: http://doi.org/10.35360/njes.36
Eriksen R. The Taming of a Shrew: Composition as Induction to Authorship. Nordic Journal of English Studies. 2005;4(2):41–63. DOI: http://doi.org/10.35360/njes.36
Eriksen, R. (2005). The Taming of a Shrew: Composition as Induction to Authorship. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 4(2), 41–63. DOI: http://doi.org/10.35360/njes.36
Eriksen R, ‘the Taming of a Shrew: Composition as Induction to Authorship’ (2005) 4 Nordic Journal of English Studies 41 DOI: http://doi.org/10.35360/njes.36
Eriksen, Roy. 2005. “the Taming of a Shrew: Composition as Induction to Authorship”. Nordic Journal of English Studies 4 (2): 41–63. DOI: http://doi.org/10.35360/njes.36
Eriksen, Roy. “the Taming of a Shrew: Composition as Induction to Authorship”. Nordic Journal of English Studies 4, no. 2 (2005): 41–63. DOI: http://doi.org/10.35360/njes.36
Eriksen, R.. “the Taming of a Shrew: Composition as Induction to Authorship”. Nordic Journal of English Studies, vol. 4, no. 2, 2005, pp. 41–63. DOI: http://doi.org/10.35360/njes.36
