This response to Hultgren’s position paper begins by examining elements of her argument. It weighs up the evidence for the assumptions which lead to her conclusions. Finally, it presents an alternative practical implication of her position.
How to Cite:
Pecorari, D., 2020. On Resisting the Distraction of the Red Herring. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 19(3), pp.137–142. DOI: http://doi.org/10.35360/njes.583
Pecorari, D., 2020. On Resisting the Distraction of the Red Herring. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 19(3), pp.137–142. DOI: http://doi.org/10.35360/njes.583
Pecorari D. On Resisting the Distraction of the Red Herring. Nordic Journal of English Studies. 2020;19(3):137–42. DOI: http://doi.org/10.35360/njes.583
Pecorari, D. (2020). On Resisting the Distraction of the Red Herring. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 19(3), 137–142. DOI: http://doi.org/10.35360/njes.583
Pecorari D, ‘On Resisting the Distraction of the Red Herring’ (2020) 19 Nordic Journal of English Studies 137 DOI: http://doi.org/10.35360/njes.583
Pecorari, Diane. 2020. “On Resisting the Distraction of the Red Herring”. Nordic Journal of English Studies 19 (3): 137–42. DOI: http://doi.org/10.35360/njes.583
Pecorari, Diane. “On Resisting the Distraction of the Red Herring”. Nordic Journal of English Studies 19, no. 3 (2020): 137–42. DOI: http://doi.org/10.35360/njes.583
Pecorari, D.. “On Resisting the Distraction of the Red Herring”. Nordic Journal of English Studies, vol. 19, no. 3, 2020, pp. 137–42. DOI: http://doi.org/10.35360/njes.583
